I'm not here to judge. We don't know what Trump can do.
It's not our job to play judge and jury, to determine who is worthy of our kindness and who is not. We just need to be kind, unconditionally and without ulterior motive, even - or rather, especially - when we'd prefer not to be.
When undertaking marriage, everyone must be the judge of his own thoughts, and take counsel from himself.
If we are honest with ourselves, we have to admit that sometimes our assumptions and preconceived notions are wrong, and therefore, our interpretation of events is incorrect. This causes us to overreact, to take things personally, or to judge people unfairly.
How one can live without being able to judge oneself, criticize what one has accomplished, and still enjoy what one does, is unimaginable to me.
You can't really win as a Booker judge. If you choose the obvious names, the unit-shifters, you're accused of being timid and unimaginative; if you choose the unfamous, you're labelled willful and perverse.
Merrick Garland was the most qualified nominee, not just in our lifetimes but perhaps in the history of the United States Supreme Court. The chief judge of the D.C. Circuit for 20 years, the nation's second-highest court. Never once been overruled by the Court in his 20 years. He was extraordinary.
To judge between good or bad, between successful and unsuccessful would take the eye of a God.
As a judge, I have always treated colleagues and litigants with the utmost respect.
I have worked with big actors, but honestly, I don't judge the viability of a project on the basis of the star value attached to it.
One can't judge Wagner's opera Lohengrin after a first hearing, and I certainly don't intend to hear it a second time.
In July of 1983, I left Washington, DC area and have had minimal contact with Judge Clarence Thomas since.
I don't have the wherewithal to judge God's will. I don't have the wherewithal to determine whether your viewpoints are right or wrong.
Nobody wants a judge to be subject to the political whim of the moment.
I think you judge players and managers on how they perform at World Cups.
World history is shaped both positively and negatively by people who judge.
When the code of laws is once fixed, it should be observed in the literal sense, and nothing more is left to the judge than to determine whether an action is or is not conformable to the written law.
One of the secret benefits of using remote workers is that the work itself becomes the yardstick to judge someone's performance.
